site stats

Smart communications v. astorga

WebRegina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by respondent Smart Communications, Incorporated (SMART) on May 8, 1997 as District Sales Manager of the Corporate Sales … The claim for the non-payment of salaries for eleven (11) months (April 1993 to … WebPETITIONER: SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. RESPONDENT: REGINA M. ASTORGA SUMMARY: Petitioner was dismissed due to redundancy following a joint venture by SMART. Petitioner filed a complaint for illegal dismissal. The company demanded that she either pay the market value of a car given to her as part of her employment benefits or to return the …

G.R. No. 181738: General Milling Corporation vs. Violeta L. Viajar ...

http://source.gosupra.com/docs/decision/15914#! WebMyLegalWhiz is a trusted online legal research and services technology for legal professionals, educators, students, businesses, employees and the general public. small basement decor ideas https://americanffc.org

2. smart communications, inc. vs. astorga - g.r. no. 148132

WebBates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, 361-362 (1977), as an example of state action immunity being granted partly because the Arizona State Bar’s rules were “subject to … WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. REGINA ASTORGA. Third Division. Sirs/Mesdames: Quoted hereunder, for your information is a resolution of this Court dated SEPT. ... G.R. … WebSmart Communications v Astorga, G.R No 148142, January 28, In document Labor case Digests (Page 103-105) RIGHT TO SECURITY OF TENURE 13. Smart Communications v … solimo french roast

G.R. No. 148132, G.R. NO. 151079 and G.R. NO. 151372 - SMART ...

Category:Redundancy Due to Abolition of Position During COVID-19 Pandemic

Tags:Smart communications v. astorga

Smart communications v. astorga

G.R. No. 148132 : September 13, 2006 : Smart Communications, …

WebFeb 3, 2024 · Filing 85 Letter from Smart Communications re Improper Third Party Subpoenas . (Flynn, Kevin) July 29, 2024: Filing 84 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #76 MOTION to Seal Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer filed by HLFIP Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - SJM FAQs Website, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - SJM How it Works to … http://source.gosupra.com/docs/decisions/2008/1#!

Smart communications v. astorga

Did you know?

WebDECISION. REYES, J.: This is a Petition 1 for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner General Milling Corporation (GMC), asking the Court to set aside the Decision 2 dated September 21, 2007 and the Resolution 3 dated January 30, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 01734; and to reinstate the Decision 4 dated … WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS vs. ASTORGA Facts: Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by Smart Communications, Incorporated (SMART) as District Sales Manager of the Corporate Sales Marketing Group/ Fixed Services Division(CSMG/FSD). She was receiving a monthly salary of P 33,650.00.

Web(Smart Communications, Inc. vs. Astorga, G.R. No. 148132, January 28, 2008.) In this light, the Supreme Court acknowledges the prerogative of the employer to adopt such measures as will promote greater efficiency, reduce overhead costs and enhance prospects of economic gains, albeit always within the framework of existing laws. WebJan 30, 2013 · In Smart Communications, Inc., v. Astorga, [34] the Court held that: The nature of redundancy as an authorized cause for dismissal is explained in the leading case of Wiltshire File Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission, viz: "x x x redundancy in an employer's personnel force necessarily or even ordinarily refers to duplication of work.

WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS v. REGINA M. ASTORGA, GR NO. 148132, 2008-01-23. Facts: Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by respondent Smart Communications, … WebDec 19, 2015 · x-----x G.R. No. 151372 January 28, 2008 REGINA M. ASTORGA, petitioner, vs. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and ANN MARGARET V. SANTIAGO, respondents. D E C I S I O N NACHURA, J. : For the resolution of the Court are three consolidated petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.

WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner, versus REGINA M. ASTORGA, Respondent. G.R. No. 148132 and G.R. No. 151079 and G.R. No. 151372 2008-01-28 THIRD DIVISION DECISION NACHURA, J.: For the resolution of the Court are three consolidated petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.

Webx - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x . D E C I S I O N . PEREZ, J.: Assailed in ... solimo dark roast coffee podssolimo towingWebSmart Communications v Astorga, G.R No 148142, January 28, In document Labor case Digests (Page 103-105) RIGHT TO SECURITY OF TENURE 13. Smart Communications v Astorga, G.R No 148142, January 28, Facts: Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by respondent SMART on May 8, 1997 as District Sales Manager of the Corporate Sales … solimo dark roast coffeeWebG.R. Nos. 151079 and 151372 question the June 11, 2001 Decision [3] and the December 18, 2001 Resolution [4] in CA-G.R. SP. No. 57065. Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed … small basement ideas photosWebApr 11, 2016 · Topic: Replevin CIVPRO Case Title: Smart Communications vs. Regina Astorga GR 148132 January 28, 2008 Prepared by: KIM DAYOS FACTS: 1. Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by respondent Smart Communications, Incorporated (SMART) on May 8, 1997 as District Sales Manager of the Corporate Sales Marketing Group/ Fixed … solimo protective underwear menhttp://source.gosupra.com/docs/decision/3571 solimus gatewayWebAugust 22, 2000 TORRES vs. CABESUELA A.M. No. P-00-1391 September 28, 2001 GOMEZ vs. CONCEPCION SPOUSES BAUTISTA vs. SULA A.M. No. P-04-1920 August 17, 2007 ALLANDALE vs. GOOD DEVELOPMENT G.R. No. 164521 December 18, 2008 P a g e 1 2 Yang v Valdez 177 S 141 Adoma v Gatcheco 448 S 299 Paat v CA 266 S 167 Citibank v CA 304 … small basement ideas ikea